exmxc
Menu
Skip to content
Four Forces research · Conviction · Capital deployment

Research builds conviction.
Conviction directs capital.

exmxc is a human-led research institution organized around the Four Forces of AI Power. We study structural constraints, publish falsifiable theses, deploy capital behind our highest-conviction conclusions, and feed market outcomes back into the next cycle of research. Entity clarity and AI-search retrieval continue as longitudinal observatories.

Observe → Research → Conviction → Deploy → Learn.

COMPUTE / INTERFACE / ALIGNMENT / ENERGY
The exmxc flywheel

Research should change what we do.

The Four Forces generate the questions. Evidence creates conviction. Capital tests the conviction. Outcomes sharpen the next research cycle.

01

Observe

Scan Compute, Interface, Alignment, and Energy for structural shifts, bottlenecks, and emerging scarcity.

02

Research

Build original datasets, frameworks, calculations, decision rules, and falsifiable theses around the strongest signals.

03

Deploy

Commit capital only when structural conviction, valuation, and downside discipline align.

04

Learn

Track what the market, counterparties, and operating data confirm or refute, then feed that evidence back into the model.

Capital scope: exmxc documents proprietary capital deployed by the founder. It does not manage client assets or provide investment advice.

Research → conviction → capital

Build the thesis. Test it with capital.

Primary research is organized around the Four Forces. Capital deployment follows conviction, valuation discipline, and explicit falsifiers.

The Four Forces, mapped · AI Lattice · Data as of

Who the AI economy depends on.

AI Lattice applies the Four Forces across the AI build-out: 92 companies, funders, grids and governments, linked by 169 sourced dependencies. Every link is dated and sourced; our judgment is kept separate from the record.

Explore the map →   See the Four Forces view →

CHOKEPOINTS · AI LATTICE v0.5.012

Where power concentrates across Compute, Interface, Alignment and Energy.
Four Forces → sourced map → chokepoints.

Falsifiable record

Thesis scorecard.

Every thesis keeps its original falsifier and status. Open work stays open; rejected ideas are not counted as wins; failed theses stay visible.

ThesisWhat would prove it wrongWhat happenedStatus
AI Infrastructure ScarcityScarcity fails to persist or earnings revisions fail to support the valuation thesis.The published 88-day recheck found all five highest-conviction sub-0.60 sPEG names delivered double-digit returns; the network layer, flagged as scarce but priced for perfection, declined.Supported · May 2026
System of Record Scarcity / PTCEmbedded product and workflow authority fails to translate into strategic value or buyer willingness to pay.PTC subsequently entered a strategic transaction at $205 per share. The transaction is evidence for the scarcity mechanism, not proof that every system of record is investable.Supported · 2026
Nuclear Uprating / VistraFederal financing fails, uprate economics deteriorate, or incremental firm-power demand does not support the investment.The market has repriced the signal, but price action is not treated as validation. Financing terms, delivered megawatts, and cash-flow capture remain the test.Open
Convergence MonitorThe six exit signals prove too noisy, correlated, or late to improve de-risking decisions.The monitor is live and time-stamped weekly. No final verdict is claimed before a full exit-side cycle is observed.Live test
Workday system-of-record candidateBacklog deceleration, stock-based compensation, or AI-layer risk remains too large relative to valuation.The candidate did not clear the decision rule. No capital was deployed; the rejection remains visible rather than being erased from the hunt board.Rejected / no-deploy

Miss discipline: a published thesis that hits its predeclared falsifier will remain here as Falsified. exmxc will not manufacture a “miss” for optics or relabel an unresolved thesis as a win.

Our analytical system

The Four Forces of AI Power.

A connected framework for understanding capability ceilings, power concentration, and long-horizon capital flows in the AI economy.

01

Compute

The chips, memory, networking, systems, capital, and energized capacity that set the ceiling on intelligence production.

02

Interface

The distribution surfaces, agents, workflows, and physical actuation layers through which intelligence reaches users and institutions.

03

Alignment

The control capacity that determines what increasingly capable systems may know, do, authorize, disclose, and recover from.

04

Energy

The firm generation, grid access, fuel, permitting, and power infrastructure that determine whether AI capacity can actually scale.

Capital instruments & longitudinal research

Measure what the thesis depends on.

sPEG and Power Lens support capital research. Entity Clarity and AI Retrieval remain longitudinal projects that track machine interpretation over time.

sPEG Index

A governed research index of companies with durable scarcity, explicit admission gates, evidence confidence, exclusions, and a separate valuation discipline.

Explore sPEG →

Entity Clarity Index

A longitudinal project measuring how consistently public entities present machine-readable identity and evidence over time.

Explore ECI →

AI Retrieval Observatory

First-party longitudinal research tracking what generative search retrieves from exmxc and controlled web properties, with preserved baselines and methodology changes.

Explore the Observatory →
Human judgment · AI instrumentation

Experience sets the questions.
Evidence shapes the answer.

exmxc studies structural shifts across the Four Forces, converts evidence into explicit conviction, deploys capital behind the strongest theses, and uses outcomes to refine the next research cycle.

Founded by Mike Ye, an M&A and corporate development executive with 25+ years of transaction leadership at Penske Media Corporation, L Brands, and Intel Capital.

Ella contributes pattern interpretation, structural analysis, and co-authorship. Human judgment governs the work.

Research precedes conviction.

Conviction precedes capital.

Outcomes update the research.